|
Insight
Matters
Fall 2005
EDITORIAL
Four
Degrees of Separation
by
Henry A. Nasrallah, M.D., Editor
One
of the greatest challenges for the psychiatric care of the seriously
mentally ill is the needless and arbitrary separation of psychiatric
care from other medical/surgical care. Much has been written
about this in the health services arena but the chasm continues.
At least four major types of separation set apart the mentally
ill from the physically ill. These separations perpetuate the
misperception that mental disorders are not physical or medical
illnesses, and these separations frequently jeopardize the overall
healthcare delivery for the millions of individuals dually affected
with illnesses of the body and the mind.
The
first separation is geographic. Does it make sense that community
mental health centers (CMHC) are free -standing and not co-located
with a general medical facility where patients can receive the
full spectrum of medical care? This "separate and different"
status perpetuates stigma and leads to inequality between psychiatric
care and general medical care.
The
second separation is financial. Psychiatric (a.k.a. mental health)
care is almost universally carved out by managed care and insurance
companies, with different benefits and revenue streams. The
outrageous lack of parity between brain disorders that affect
the mind (e.g. thoughts, emotions, behavior and cognition) versus
the body (e.g. motor movements, sensations, gait) is an appalling
and flagrant injustice to the 60 million Americans who suffer
from a psychiatric illness.
The
third separation is organizational. The medical records of CMCH
patients are entirely separate from any other medical records
that these patients may have. This clearly precludes optimal
psychiatric and medical care and leads to misdiagnosis, medication
errors, and unnecessary laboratory procedures. The millions
of the chronically mentally ill who are at high risk for serious
medical disorders (such as heart disease, cancer, emphysema,
obesity, diabetes, hypertension, sleep apnea, stroke) are often
under-served due to this lack of integration of the totality
of healthcare. To its great credit, only the VA system has a
combined electronic medical records system for the veterans
regardless of what they suffer from, and that is a "best
practice" that should be a model for all other systems
of care. Even Kaiser Permanente, an HMO which is enlightened
enough to co-localize psychiatry with other medical clinics
under one roof, still uses separate medical records.
The
fourth separation is cultural. Most CMHCs have devolved over
the years from a medical model (psychiatry) to a non-medical
paradigm (behavioral health). Sick individuals at the CMHC are
"clients", not patients as if receiving medical care
is a business transaction, not medical care. Over the years,
psychiatrists have experienced a diminished role in CMHCs compared
to the standard physician leadership in general medical/surgical
settings. The CMHC culture accommodates "therapists"
rather than "medical practitioners" yet the patients
who fill the waiting rooms of these clinics suffer from brain
disorders that are some of the most serious and disabling medical
illnesses [e.g. schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and OCD where
medical intervention, not psychotherapy, is the primary and
indispensable ingredient for symptom control.
So
let's do something about those separations. Let's re-medicalize
the system of psychiatric health care, while preserving the
importance of psychosocial care, by putting the medical aspects
of psychiatric illnesses front and center so they can be seamlessly
managed with other, co-occurring medical disorders. Let's do
it for the sake of our patients with schizophrenia who die from
various medical illnesses 16 years earlier than the average
life expectancy of the general population. Let's reintegrate
psychiatric practice with the rest of medicine geographically,
financially, administratively, and culturally. Everyone will
be better off without these separation
Back
to newsletter
|